Prior to our demo
teaching in UPIS, we had to do a microteaching session with our classmates. Due
to the storm and class cancellations, instead of two meetings, we had to cram
everything into one day so as to push through with the scheduled demo teaching.
At first it was a
little overwhelming because instead of focusing on just the first part of our
demo which was the literature, we also had to also do the skills development
part which was honestly the harder chunk. If in the literature half, the
problematic part was unlocking of words; in the skills development, it was
teaching the lesson without really having to state the rules explicitly.
Before the microteaching,
I thought that I had the grammar teaching part covered since I already taught
this lesson to my students before. But
it turned out to be a totally different experience since we are using a
different method of teaching. When I was teaching direct and indirect objects
to Koreans before, we went for a sentence pattern approach. We state right away
that this is this, and that is that. We give examples and so on and so forth.
But this time, we had to draw out the definitions and generalizations from the
students themselves. When you first look at it, it’s really hard because most of
the time, the students expect you to give them the answers. But then again,
rethinking on this, maybe it really is a better method since you do not bank on
the notion that they have prior knowledge but on the belief that they have the
capacity to figure it out on their own without having to spoon feed them.
For the microteaching
of course, we had it easy since our classmates were our students. They
participated well, most probably because we were all on the same boat. In the
same way, we participated and enjoyed their presentations. They also gave
feedback that helped us later on with the group teaching in UPIS.
But that doesn't mean
that our microteaching would be flawless. The main fault was our lesson plan.
We had revised it a couple of times, but still it wasn't the best, nor would I
say that it was even appropriate. We learned a great deal from out classmates. Admittedly, theirs was a better presentation of the same topic we had. We learned
that we had to fix the second half of our lesson which was the skills
development. We had to redo a lot of our sample sentences and worksheets. After
the microteaching, our lesson plan had an overhaul. I am really thankful
that we had a microteaching session. If not, we would have failed very very badly in
our group teaching.
There are many things I have learned in it. First is that
you should always check your samples and exercise items –all of them—if they
are covered well by the definition you gave. Second, you can make your students
do the same thing over and over again without them being tired of it if you
present it in different creative ways. Third, being on time lessens the
anxiety. Fourth and the most important one: no lesson plan is ever final. There
will always be revisions and you must be ready to make them no matter how
little time you have.
All in all, I believe
that the microteaching has helped us a lot in preparation for our group
teaching. It is not the perfect simulation but it prepared us and helped us
find holes that we can still fix. Sadly, there isn't always a microteaching session for all the lesson plans that we will make in the future. That being said, I think we all should practice and try to learn as much as we can from these experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment